
Image via Wikipedia
As far as the Civil Code as enacted on 25th
December, 1910, and the provisions of the law of
Marriage as a Civil Contract in Goa, Daman and Diu
which came into force on 26th May, 1911, are
concerned, we are unable to agree with Ms. Aggarwal
that all marriages performed within the territory
of Goa unless registered should be void. The said
provision was altered by the decree of 22nd January,
1946, which restored the validity of both Catholic
marriages and Hindu marriages. Two Hindus,
therefore, can contract a marriage according to
Hindu religious rites or by way of a civil
marriage. Section 2 of the Hindu Marriage Act
extends the operation of the Act to the whole of
1
India except Jammu and Kashmir and also applies to
Hindus domiciled in the territories to which the
Act extends who are outside the said territories.
In other words, the provisions of the Hindu
Marriage Act, 1955, would be applicable to the
petitioner's case and can be heard by any Court
having jurisdiction within the territories to which
it applies.
14. We are not convinced with the submissions
made by Ms. Aggarwal that the annulment proceedings
cannot be heard outside the State of Goa in view of
the existing laws which made the Civil Code and the
laws relating to marriage applicable to all persons
residing within the State of Goa. In addition to
the above, Sections 5 and 6 of the Goa, Daman & Diu
(Administration) Act, 1962, indicate that the
Central Government has the authority to extend
enactments applicable to the rest of the country.
In other words, even if it were to be held that it
1
is the customary law in Goa which would prevail
over the personal law of the parties, the same
could not be a bar to the transfer of the matter
outside the State of Goa to any other State. What
would be of relevance is the finding arrived at by
the Bombay High Court in Goa in Monica Variato's
case (supra) that even applying the principles of
Private International Law, bearing in mind various
personal laws in this country, even though the
spouses are domiciled in Goa in respect of a
marriage performed outside Goa but in any other
State of the Union, they would be governed by their
personal laws in so far as dissolution of marriage
is concerned. Notwithstanding the fact that the
marriage between the parties had been conducted in
Goa, the same having been conducted under their
personal laws and under Hindu rites and traditions,
we are satisfied that the claim of the petitioner
is justified and there can be no difficulty in
1
allowing the prayer of the petitioner.
IN A TRASFER PETITION THIS INTERESTING POINT RAISED AND IS VERY NICELY
SLOVED BY THEIR LORD SHIPS OF APEX COURT IN
Vinisha Jitesh Tolani
@ Manmeet Laghmani ..Petitioner
Vs.
Jitesh Kishore Tolani ..Respondent
FOR DETAILS SEE MY APEX COURT CASE LAW WEBSITE.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Discussion
Comments are closed.