//
you're reading...
legal issues

service matter = for appointment in job= In a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Excise Superintendent, Malkapatnam vs. K.B.N.Visweswara Rao (1996 (6) SCALE 676), it was held that whose names are enrolled with the Employment Exchange and who have been sponsored will be considered and also other candidates, who have responded to the notification for public employment will also be considered.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:

Eagle with flag in background.

Image via Wikipedia

HYDERABAD

MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY

TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN

PRESENT:

 

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

 

WRIT PETITION No.19302 OF 2011

 

BETWEEN:

Thalamanchi Sanath Kumar S/o.Jaya Kumar Reddy

…. Petitioner

AND

The Regional Manager, Syndicate Bank,

Plot No.5, Rutwik Enclave, A.K. Nagar Post,

S.P.S.R.Nellore.

                    …. Respondent

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

 

WRIT PETITION No.19302 OF 2011

ORDER:

This Writ Petition has been instituted by the candidate belonging to O.C. community who got his name enrolled with the Employment Exchange at Nellore, soliciting directions to the respondent to consider his candidature for recruitment to the post of temporary Attender in the respondent Bank.

2.  In a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Excise Superintendent, Malkapatnam vs. K.B.N.Visweswara Rao (1996 (6) SCALE 676), it was held that whose names are enrolled with the Employment Exchange and who have been sponsored will be considered and also other candidates, who have responded to the notification for public employment will also be considered.

3.  In view of the above judgment, the case of the petitioner has to be considered if he made an application to the respondent and he is duly eligible and qualified in terms of the requisition letter, dated
06-01-2011, of the respondent to the Employment Officer, District Employment Exchange, Nellore.  The respondent shall call the petitioner for interview if the selection process is not over and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law.

4.  With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________

                                                                                       K.C. BHANU, J

July 11, 2011.

KTL

About advocatemmmohan

ADVOCATE

Discussion

Comments are closed.

Blog Stats

  • 2,881,396 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

archieves

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers

Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: