and vipin.

ADMISSION IS THE CONCLUSIVE PROOF. -The 1960 deed describes status of the plaintiff as perpetual lessee and it further records that the question of nature of the Plaintiff’s right was reconsidered by the Defendant at the request of Laxman Das and after examining it they were satisfied that the Plaintiff held the land on lease in perpetuity. This is not only the admission on the part of the Defendant but the 1960 Deed also records that the Defendant had determined the status of the Plaintiff over the land after consideration. 79. This determination is admission of the Defendant. It is conclusive proof of the status of the Plaintiff as neither any explanation for the same has been offered, nor any action has been taken against Laxman Das.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD  AFR  Reserved  Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. – 962 of 2004  Petitioner :- State Of U.P. Thru’ Collector, Mathura  Respondent :- Thakur Sri Radha Ramanji Maharaj  Petitioner Counsel :- S.C.  Respondent Counsel :- Shamim Ahmad,R.K.Jain,Vipin Sinha  Hon’ble Yatindra Singh, J  Hon’ble Dinesh Gupta, J  (Delivered by Hon’ble Yatindra Singh, … Continue reading →