Bhago

whether extra-judicial confession of A1-Pratham inspires confidence and then find out whether there are other cogent circumstances on record, to support it. =This Court clarified that though confession may be regarded as evidence in generic sense because of the provisions of Section 30 of the

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1050 OF 2005 PANCHO … APPELLANT Versus STATE OF HARYANA … RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1222 OF 2005 PRATHAM … APPELLANT Versus STATE OF HARYANA … RESPONDENT JUDGMENT (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. These two appeals, by special leave, can be disposed … Continue reading →