DECREE: Final decree and Preliminary decree – Distinction between -Discussed. Preliminary decree – Compromise application – Tenor of application showed that the parties to the compromise settled the entire controversy and they were in separate and exclusive possession of the properties allotted to their respective shares – The compromise application did not contain any clause … Continue reading
Reduced the sentence from life to 10 years in sec. 304 B IPC applying the participles laid down in commuting death penalty to life imprisonment, even though there is no guide lines and separate rules for lessor sentences – other than death sentences ; Apex court held that same principles laid down in death cases- would … Continue reading
published in http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=40836 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 659 OF 2006 State of Rajasthan … Appellant (s) Versus Jamil Khan … Respondent (s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.: 1. All murders shock the community; but certain murders shock the conscience of the Court and … Continue reading
published in http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=40743 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 165-166 OF 2011 Sunil Damodar Gaikwad … Appellant (s) Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent (s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.: 1. Death and if not life, death or life, life and if not death, … Continue reading
published in http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=40743 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 165-166 OF 2011 Sunil Damodar Gaikwad … Appellant (s) Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent (s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.: 1. Death and if not life, death or life, life and if not death, … Continue reading
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7548 OF 2002 Dayanandi … Appellant Versus Rukma D. Suvarna and others … Respondents J U D G M E N T G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High … Continue reading
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2837 of 2009 ORDER:- This revision is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13-04-2009 passed in Small Cause Suit No.9 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil … Continue reading
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AFR Reserved Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. – 962 of 2004 Petitioner :- State Of U.P. Thru’ Collector, Mathura Respondent :- Thakur Sri Radha Ramanji Maharaj Petitioner Counsel :- S.C. Respondent Counsel :- Shamim Ahmad,R.K.Jain,Vipin Sinha Hon’ble Yatindra Singh, J Hon’ble Dinesh Gupta, J (Delivered by Hon’ble Yatindra Singh, … Continue reading
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION S.L.P. (CRIMINAL) NO…………..OF 2011 (CRLMP.NO(s). 16406/2011) STATE OF U.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALOK VERMA Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard Mr. Pramod Swarup, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner-State of U.P. The allegations against the respondent accused, which have been found true by the … Continue reading
PETITIONER: NARAMADABEN MAGANLAL THAKKER Vs. RESPONDENT: PRANJIVANDAS MAGANLAL THAKKER & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/09/1996 BENCH: K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court made in FA No. 421/74 on September … Continue reading