//
archives

customs excise

This tag is associated with 12 posts

the CESTAT has limited power to rectify its mistake under the provision of Section 35C(2) of the Act. The relevant portion of the said section reads as under: “35C(2) – The Appellate Tribunal may, at any time within six months from the date of the order, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it under sub-section (1) and shall make such amendments if the

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4409 OF 2010 COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE, BELAPUR, MUMBAI …..APPELLANT. VERSUS RDC CONCRETE (INDIA) P. LTD. …..RESPONDENT. J U D G M E N T ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the Order dated 23rd November, 2009, passed in Appeal … Continue reading

These appeals arise out of Judgment and Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench [for short “CEGAT”] on 02.08.2002 whereby the Tribunal had allowed the appeals filed by the respondents holding that the respondents were not guilty of clandestine removal of excisable goods and also that the goods of

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4500-4502 OF 2003 Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai …. Appellant Versus M/s. Kalvert Foods India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …. Respondents JUDGMENT Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J. 1. These appeals arise out of Judgment and Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 2,881,030 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

archieves

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers

Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com