//
archives

harsh vardhan

This tag is associated with 1 post

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD=In these circumstances, the registrations in her name deserve to be removed. It appears that the division of property between the estranged couple is under consideration before the matrimonial Court, at that time the rights to the intellectual property in these trade marks may also be decided. The Civil Court has directed the Registrar of Trademarks to maintain a status quo, the respondent apprehended that blank papers signed by her may be misused by her husband Mr. Matang Sinh. That is to restrain the Registrar from effecting any change of name. But this status quo cannot stand in the way of our deciding these rectification applications which have been filed in accordance with law. 16. For all the aforesaid reasons, the rectification applications ORA/64/2009/TM/DEL and ORA/65/2009/TM/DEL are allowed with a direction to the Registrar of Trade Marks to remove the trade marks registered under Nos.1239523 and 1239515 in Class 41 and Class 38 respectively from the register of Trade Marks. All Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD   Guna Complex Annexe-I, 2nd Floor, 443, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600018  * * * * * * * CIRCUIT BENCH SITTING AT DELHI   M.P. No.51/2009 IN ORA/64/2009/TM/DEL & ORA/64/2009/TM/DEL AND M.P. No.52/2009 IN ORA/65/2009/TM/DEL & ORA/65/2009/TM/DEL      FRIDAY, THIS THE 9th DAY OF  MARCH, 2012   Hon’ble Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan            … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 2,887,297 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

archieves

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers
Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com