//
archives

High Court (Hong Kong)

This tag is associated with 2 posts

senior civil judge courts of A.P. has got jurisdiction to entertain the cases under Indian succession act=This Court in R.O.C.No.40/So/72.2 – under the provision of Section 19 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972 (Act 19 of 1972) and in super cession of the previous Notification on the subject, authorized all Subordinate Judges (including the Additional Judges in the City Civil Courts) to take cognizance of any proceedings under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, (Act 39 of 1925) which cannot be disposed of by the District Delegates. 3. Therefore, in view of the above proceedings, this Court authorized all the Subordinate Judges to take cognizance of the proceedings under Indian Succession Act. Hence, the impugned order is not in accordance with law and the same is liable to be set aside.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH  AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.46 OF 2010 Between:   Ambadipudi Nagaratnamma ….. APPELLANT AND To whom so ever it may concern ….RESPONDENT     The Court … Continue reading

interim maintenance =Though a lengthy counter is filed, the appellant never stated about his actual salary received by him and no document is filed to that effect. Therefore, the Court below was of the opinion that though there was no record with regard to the rental income from the house, the appellant herein has not filed any document to prove that he is not drawing a net salary of Rs.75,000/-. Therefore, the Court below has taken into account that the appellant herein has been drawing net salary of Rs.75,000/- per month. However, the Court below granted interim maintenance @Rs.3,500/- only per month to each of the respondents, totaling Rs.10,500/- per month from the date of petition pending disposal of the main OP. Therefore, it cannot be said that the interim maintenance granted by the Court below is exorbitant and excessive. We do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR F.C.A.No.145 of 2011 Between: Bathula Naga Veerabhadra Ganga Rajesh ….. APPELLANT AND Bathula Vijaya Durga Bhavani and 2 others …..RESPONDENTS The … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 2,884,333 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

archieves

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers

Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com