high court judges

whether the first respondent who functioned as the President of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in Madhya Pradesh (“State Commission” for short) for a period of about 4 years and 11 months, after his retirement as a High Court Judge, was entitled to receive pension for this subsequent period in the = Insofar as the order dated April 5, 2002 issued by the Government of Madhya Pradesh according sanction for counting the service of the respondent on the post of President, State = In view of divergence of opinion in terms of separate judgments pronounced by us in this appeal today, the Registry is directed to place the papers before Hon’ble the Chief Justice for appeal being assigned to an appropriate Bench.

1 REPORTABLE   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5322 OF 2005   The Accountant General, M.P. …. Appellant Versus S.K. Dubey & Anr. ….Respondents     JUDGMENT   R.M. Lodha, J. The Accountant General, Madhya Pradesh is in appeal, by special leave, aggrieved by the judgment and order … Continue reading →