m sales

jurisdiction of a court under an agreement confined one court is valid ?=whether, if two Courts have jurisdiction to entertain a Suit, whether the parties may by mutual agreement exclude the jurisdiction of one of the Courts, having regard to the =”Thus it is now a settled principle that where there may be two or more competent Courts which can entertain a suit consequent upon a part of the cause of action having arisen therewithin, if the parties to the contract agreed to vest jurisdiction in one such Court to try the dispute which might arise as between themselves, the agreement would be valid. If such a contract is clear, unambiguous and explicit and not vague, it is not hit by Sections 23 and 28 of the Contract Act and cannot also be understood as parties contracting against the statute.”

1   REPORTABLE     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.10184 of 2008     A.V.M. SALES CORPORATION … PETITIONER     VS.     M/S. ANURADHA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. … RESPONDENT     J U D G M E N T     ALTAMAS … Continue reading →