marriage ceremony

whether the fact that the decree of divorce was set aside and the marriage between A1 and the complainant was revived was known to A3, A4 and A5. Merely because A3 is the sister of A1, it cannot be presumed that she knew that the decree of divorce was set aside. If A1 wanted to marry A4, it is possible that he would keep back these facts from his sister as also from A4 and A5 i.e. his second wife and her father respectively.= acquitted under the benefit of doubt.

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 234-235 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 1262-1263 of 2009) Kannan … Appellant Versus Selvamuthukani … Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.236 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7924 of 2009)   Murugayee & Ors. … Appellants Versus Selvamuthukani … Continue reading →