Mau Police Station

Death – Strangulation – Case Reg. under sec.174 Cr.P.C. as Suicide & Reported – after one year Fir was Reg. under sec.302/34 – Trial convicted the accused – High court confirmed the same though find that prosecution acted biased – Apex court held that material omissions like non-explanation of delay of one year in registering FIR, non-marking of Marg report reg. under sec.174 Cr.P.C. – Balram Singh, Assistant Sub- Inspector of Mau Police Station, who registered the Marg under Section 174 CrPC was not examined in the trial – non-explanation of Eye witnesses from lodging FIR against the accused immediately – examination of additional new witnesses after one year of the FIR – a slipshod investigation – though high court found the latches but simply discarded without assigning valid reasons High court fell in error and as such Apex court set aside convict orders of lower courts as prosecution failed to prove it’s case beyond all reasonable doubts and acquitted the accused by allowing appeal =Sobaran Singh & Ors. .. Appellant(s) versus State of M.P. .. Respondent(s) =2014 – July. Part – http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41753

Death – Strangulation – Case Reg. under sec.174 Cr.P.C. as Suicide & Reported – after one year Fir was Reg. under sec.302/34 – Trial convicted the accused – High court confirmed the same though find that prosecution acted biased – Apex court held that material omissions like non-explanation of delay of one year in registering … Continue reading →