//
archives

Navi Mumbai

This tag is associated with 2 posts

service matter =“Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for Municipal Corporation, we are of the view that the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Sudhir R. Bhatankar v. State of Maharashtra and others, 1999 (Supp.) Bom. C.R. 910 : 2000(1) Mh.L.J. 519. in so far it holds that the provisions of section 56(1)(b) of the B.P.M.C. Act will not apply where suspension is for holding an enquiry in the charges levelled against an officer requires reconsideration. The matter shall accordingly, be placed before the Larger Bench.”

1 WP.1797.11.doc ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1797 OF 2011 1. Ambarish Rangshahi Patnigere, Aged 45 years, Occup: Service, R/o Abhishek, 101, Plot No. B72/ 2, Sector No.23, Nerul, Navi Mumbai. 2. Namdeo Narayan Alhat, Aged 55 years, Occup: Service, R/o H/1/2/3, Paradise Society, Sector … Continue reading

2. Petitioners were the complainants before the District Forum. They alleged deficiency in service on the part of the respondents, in that the respondents had failed to execute the agreement for sale even after the complainants had made full payment of the consideration for the flats and received the possession thereof from the respondents. The respondents/opposite parties (OPs) resisted the complaint mainly on the ground that the cost of construction had risen steeply leading to their demand for escalation charges at the rate of Rs.200/- per square foot and that each of the complainants had not paid Rs.2,40,000/- towards the original agreed sale price of the flat.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO.3129 OF 2011 (From the order dated 25.03.2011 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai in First Appeal no. A/09/941) Ankit Bhatnagar C/o P. K. Bhatnagar                                                        Petitioner Resident of 25, Panvel Co-operative Industrial Estate Panvel – 410206 versus 1. Vijay Constructions 305/C, 3rd Floor, Raikar Bhavan Sector 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai                                             Respondents 2. Vijay Angre 305/C, 3rd Floor, Raikar Bhavan Sector 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai   … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 2,887,297 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

archieves

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers
Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com