patents designs

This tag is associated with 2 posts

The application for patent No.197257 was filed on 29.09.1997 in the name of the inventor Mr. Hubert Jacques Francois. Form 6 was then filed on 18.07.2002 and the application was allowed to proceed in the name of the applicant herein. The application was examined and found in order for grant which was published on 03.06.2005. A request under S.78(4) was filed on 02.07.2005 to carry out clerical corrections and amendments. Four amendments were sought for in the complete specifications and the claims. In the impugned order all the four were reversed. The applicant has filed an appeal against the reversal of the three amendments and for some reason the respondent has filed an appeal under the impression that the words “consisting of” has been amended to “comprising of”. To conclude, we allow amendment of the patent specifications as follows: (i) Wherever the word “roller” is found, it shall be amended to “pad”; (ii) The prayer for changing “homogenous solid solution” to “homogenous phase” is rejected; (iii) The prayer for changing the word “weight” to “volume” in the last sentence of Claim 1 and Claim 4 is rejected and (iv) The prayer for amendment of the word “consisting of” to “comprising of” in Claim 1 is rejected. 30. The application for patent is allowed to proceed on the basis of complete specifications found in order for grant on 09.02.2005 with substitution of words “roller” with “pad” which we have found to be a translation error as per para ante. The order of the Controller, therefore, stands modified to that extent. The respondent No. 3 is directed to amend the patent specification and claims accordingly and publish the same. 31. OA/4/2007/PT/DEL is therefore, partially allowed. OA/17/2010/PT/DEL is allowed. No order as to costs.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD Guna Complex Annexe-I, 2nd Floor, 443 Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600018 (Circuit Bench Sitting at Delhi)   OA/4/2007/PT/DEL AND OA/17/2010/PT/DEL FRIDAY, THIS THE 1st  DAY OF JUNE, 2012   HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE PRABHA SRIDEVAN    … CHAIRMAN HON’BLE SHRI D.P.S. PARMAR                               … TECHNICAL MEMBER (PATENTS)   OA/4/2007/PT/DEL   Magotteaux International S.A. (Belgium), C/o Dr. Ramesh … Continue reading

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD = unauthorized person taken away the bundle and records from the file= In July 2010, when the appellant checked the status of the application under No. 1635094 in the Registry’s website, they came to know that the application was withdrawn. On 13.07.2010, the appellant’s attorney filed an application for physical inspection. As the file was not traceable immediately, inspection of the physical file was conducted in October, 2010. On inspection, the attorney came to know that the application was examined on 08.09.2008 and on 05.11.2008 an examination report was sent to Ranjan Narula Associates. On 26.10.2009, one Gauri Kumar, Advocate appeared before the Examiner for the hearing fixed on that date and withdrew the application for registration. It was also revealed from the inspection that various documents namely, the Power of Attorney on TM-48, the Form TM-16 etc., sent by the present attorney were not available in the file.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATEBOARD Guna Complex Annexe-I, 2nd Floor, 443 Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600018                                                                                                                             ***** (Circuit Bench at Delhi)   OA/76/2011/TM/DEL   WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2012   HON’BLE MS. S. USHA                                                          … VICE-CHAIRMAN HON’BLE Shri V. RAVI                                                          … TECHNICAL MEMBER Emerson Network Power – Embedded Computing, Inc. 2900 South Diablo … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 2,887,299 hits



Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers
Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com