advocatemmmohan
School Leaving Certificate
Service matter – Notice of superannuation – Form B was disputed in the year 1987 itself – not decided – School leaving certificate bares correct date of birth – not challenged – at fag end Employer can not dispute it – Writ field by Employee allowed – Apex court too confirmed the order of High court = M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and Ors. … Appellants vs. Chhota Birsa Uranw … Respondent =2014 (April. Part)http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41470
Service matter – Notice of superannuation – Form B was disputed in the year 1987 itself – not decided – School leaving certificate bares correct date of birth – not challenged – at fag end Employer can not dispute it – Writ field by Employee allowed – Apex court too confirmed the order of High … Continue reading
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. = The certificate reveals the date of birth of the accused as 10.05.1991. The school leaving certificate was proved by examining the head mistress of the school. She has recognized the signatures of the principal who issued the school leaving certificate. The evidence adduced by the head mistress was not challenged. Consequently, there is no reason to discard that document. Further, we notice that there was some confusion as to whether the appellant, whose name is Ranjeet Goswami is the same person Rajiv Ranjan Goswami. The investigating officer’s report indicates that they are different persons. Consequently we have to take it that the school leaving certificate produced was in respect of the appellant which has been proved.- We, therefore, find no reason to reject the school leaving certificate. If that be so, as per the ratio laid down in Ashwani Kumar Saxena (supra) there is no question of subjecting the accused to a medical examination by a medical board. Going by the school leaving certificate since the appellant was a juvenile on the date of occurrence, he can be tried only by the JJ Board. Consequently, the order passed by the High Court is set aside and that of the Sessions Judge, Dumka is restored. The appeal is allowed, as stated above.
published in http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=40789 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1465 OF 2013 (@ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.10661 of 2010) Ranjeet Goswami ….. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand & Anr. ….. Respondents J U D G M E N T K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. We notice … Continue reading
thakur caste certificate= students = enjoyed reservation for the past 9 years, finally it was found that the caste certificate issued was not correct, the apex court directed to pay the difference fee so far enjoyed with out disturbing their degrees obtained and directed that they are not entitled for any further benefits = The petitioner in SLP(C)No.3314 of 2010, is the father of the petitioners in the other two Special Leave Petitions, one being the son and the other being the daughter of the petitioner, Dattu Thakur, son of Namdev Thakur. In all these cases, =In support of the case of the petitioner(s), an order passed by another Bench of this Court in C.A.No.7411 of 2010 (Swati Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.), on 6th September, 2010, was brought to our notice, wherein in similar circumstances, the Court while dismissing the civil appeal, directed that the benefits that had already been enjoyed by the candidate, and the degree obtained by her in the BDS course, which she had completed, would continue. The Court further directed that she
SLP(C)3314/10 +2 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SLP(CIVIL) No(s).3314 OF 2010 DATTU S/O NAMDEV THAKUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) NO. 3370 of 2010 SLP(C) NO. 3365 of 2010 J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR, J. Special Leave Petition(C)Nos. 3314, … Continue reading
