selvaraj

assessment of evidence on adultery =It is true that the appellant has denied receiving those letters and has also denied that she ever sent any letters to Chandra Prakash. One can understand this denial in the case of a person like the appellant who was facing a petition for divorce on the ground of adultery. But assuming that those two letters were received by the appellant, that does not in our opinion prove that there was any adultery between the appellant and Chandra Prakash in 1955. We have read those letters and we must say that they are most improper and should not have been written by a person like Chandra Prakash who was married to the cousin of the appellant. But the first thing that strikes us is that the mere fact that some male relation writes such letters to a married woman, does not necessarily prove that there was any illicit relationship between the writer of the letters and the married woman who received them. The matter may have been different if any letters of the appellant written to Chandra Prakash had been proved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.01.2012 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MOHAN RAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.1946 & 1947 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 Mr. K.Chandrasekar … Appellant in both CMAs -Vs.- 1. Mrs. Ramani … R-1 in CMA No.1946 of 2008 … Continue reading →