//
archives

vasundhara

This tag is associated with 1 post

there is only demand for payment of Rs.10,000/- and fan by A1, but there is no evidence to establish the harassment caused by A1 to the deceased in connection with the demand for payment of the said Rs.10,000/- and fan. Therefore, the prosecution could not establish that soon before the death of the deceased, she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by the appellant in connection with the demand for dowry.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No.327 of 2002 15-07-2011 Alakunta Yadaiah 1.State of A.P.,through Public Prosecutor COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: Smt.Vasundhara Reddy.C COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT: This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence passed by III-Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), at N.T.R. Nagar, L.B. Nagar,R.R.Dist, in S.C.No.351 … Continue reading

Blog Stats

  • 2,884,318 hits

ADVOCATE MMMOHAN

archieves

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,905 other followers

Follow advocatemmmohan on WordPress.com